Source: Npros 11/13/2016
FTC Sends Checks to Former FHTM Representatives
FHTM and its top two executives were sued by the FTC and the attorneys general of Kentucky, North Carolina and Illinois for "unfair and deceptive actions" that violated state and federal laws. Among the charges: misrepresenting income potential and claiming average people could attain financial independence through FHTM.
About 90% of FHTM independent representatives earned less than $15 a year, but they were expected to spend about $1,500 a year on products and membership fees, former Kentucky attorney general Jack Conway said in 2013.
Related News
-
FTC Bans FHTM from Multilevel Marketing
Frankfort, KY, May 13, 2014 -- An order entered by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky bans Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing (FHTM) and its operators from multilevel marketing under a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission and the Attorneys General of Kentucky, Illinois and N... Read More...Fortune HiTech Marketing Principals Issue Statement Denying Wrongdoing
Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. principals Paul Orberson and Thomas Mills issued the following statement relating to litigation with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Attorneys General of Illinois, Kentucky and North Carolina: LEXINGTON, Ky., Feb. 7, 2013 -- "We deny any wrongdoing and will... Read More...Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing Shut Down-Assets Seized-by Kentucky AG
The headquarters and warehouse of Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing were seized Monday, and the business placed in receivership, when the FTC and Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway's office alleged in a lawsuit that the company operated a "massive pyramid scheme".The lawsuit alleges that more than 90 ... Read More...Federal Judge Rescinds FHTM Class Action Dismissal
Lexington, KY September 22, 2012 -- On Friday, September 13, 2012, the United States District Court Eastern District of Kentucky rescinded its dismissal and reinstated a proposed class-action lawsuit against Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. (FHTM). The judge ruled in favor of the Plaintiffs and again... Read More...